Protecting our National Parks

Posted on 03 May 2012 by Cate

It feels like national parks are under seige with minority interest groups taking advantage of the O’Farrell Government’s lax attitudes to the environment. Horse riders are getting a green light to cause more damage to our National Parks, a parliamentary inquiry has been set up to attack National Parks and the Government has a wholesale moratorium on new marine parks. What has our native wildlife done to deserve such an assault on their last refuges?

 Parliamentary Inquiry

A deal between the Shooters & Fishers Party and Coalition members has seen a  Parliamentary Inquiry established with a barely disguised intention to attack national parks. I have been appointed to sit on the Inquiry on behalf of the NSW Greens and will be doing my utmost to ensure an environmentally responsible view point is heard. You can help me defend our national parks and send a submission to the inquiry here.  

Horse riding

Ask the average NSW citizen if they want national parks like the Blue Mountains to be free from weeds, erosion and other degradation and they would surely say yes. So why then is the O’Farrell Government deliberately adopting strategies that will inevitably increase weed invasion, erosion and environmental degradation in our national parks? The answer of course is politics.

The Government has just released a new policy to open up national parks, reserves and even some wilderness areas to horse riding Draft strategic directions for horse riding in NSW national parks and reserves

Horses introduce weeds through the seeds and pathogens carried in their manure and their hooves erode fragile soils. Once weeds are introduced you can’t take them back. National Parks & Wildlife Service frequently refers to horses as ‘pest animals’.

The policy throws science and the precautionary principle to the wind. We already know that horses introduce weeds to national parks yet the Government is prepared to exacerbate this risk further and even newly introduce horse rising to our precious designated wilderness areas. This will contravene the definition of ‘self reliance’ that applies to access to wilderness areas in the legislation.

This policy is being driven by an outdated 2006 MOU between the NSW Liberal/Nationals and a Coalition of Horse Riders and, as unfortunately becoming all too common-place with this Government, science has been swept aside.

Take action – make a submission

You can write your own personal submission online here. Individual submissions carry more weight but if you don’t have the time, please consider using this form submission below. Add any additional comments you may have at the bottom.

Dear Madam/Sir

RE: Draft strategic directions for horse riding in NSW national parks and reserves

I do not support the proposed Draft Strategic Directions for Horse Riding in NSW national parks and reserves. It will increase weed invasion, soil erosion and the degradation of our national parks.

The 3000 kilometres of trails currently available to horse riders is already causing damage to the park estate. This threat should be mitigated and not increased and horse riding should remain prohibited in wilderness areas.

The environmental degradation this policy will lead to will be irreversible. Once you introduce weeds to a national park or wilderness area you can not take them back. Unfortunately, horse riding is too great a threat to the native plants and wildlife national parks were created to preserve and should not be allowed.

We respectfully ask that the horse riding fraternity be content with the countless kilometres of horse riding trails that are already available to them.

Yours sincerely

Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

Choose a Subject Heading (required)

Your Suburb (optional)

Additional Comments (optional)

2 Comments For This Post

  1. Sally Cavanagh Says:

    Dear Mr O’Farrell,
    I have been involved in the horse industry for many years and also been a lover and supporter of National Parks.
    I do not support the introduction of further horse riding in NP for many reasons.
    NP primary objective is to protect the remaining fragile, diversity of our unique continent.
    The management of Parks are already dealing with issues of human impacts and to introduce horses to more areas, would open up a minefield of problems.
    Horses create major erosion and their hard hooves compact and make deep grooves which turn into watercourses. As we already Know.
    How are Parks Rangers going to control horse owners as they do not have the same understanding of natural heritage as many visitors to the park?
    Who is responsible for accidents, insurance for horse riding is expensive because it is a dangerous activity?
    The weed issue – I am sure horse owners are not going to stop and collect the manure.
    Combining bush walkers and horse riders can also be a dangerous combination. Horses are rather big and will always win. They can kick if frightened.
    We are assuming that the horse riders are responsible and experienced.
    Having horses in camping areas will soon turn it into a bog and encourage weeds.
    How many more rangers are Parks going to employ to manage and police this activity?
    As an experienced horse person I have always accepted that you don’t have horses and dogs in NPs and know that I have to ride somewhere else. Give poor old nature a break.
    Horses create too many impacts.
    The problems that will arise from the introduction of further horse riding in Parks far out ways the benefits for a few.
    Where will it stop. Next they will want to log NP because State Forests have exhausted their resource as a result of unsustainable practises.
    Yours Sally

  2. Ernie Gerzabek Says:

    I do not want any horse manure contamination in our National Parks.

RELATED SITES

More in Blog, Take Action (48 of 148 articles)