Tag Archive | "pollution"

Tags: , ,

Urgent assessment of NSW ammonium nitrate facilities needed after Texas explosion – Greens

Posted on 22 April 2013 by Cate

And relocate Orica’s Kooragang Island plant

Greens MP and environment spokesperson Cate Faehrmann is calling on the government to undertake an urgent assessment of all ammonium nitrate storage and production facilities across the state, following the devastating explosion of an ammonium nitrate plant in Texas.

Ms Faehrmann says the government should also order the relocation of Orica’s ammonium nitrate plant and Incitec Pivot’s storage facility on Kooragang Island due to its proximity to residents.

“The explosion in Texas was felt up to 100km away in Dallas, with many residents reporting they believed it was an earthquake the explosion was so enormous,” Ms Faehrmann said.

“The NSW Government needs to be able to guarantee the safety of communities living near large chemical facilities like the one in Texas, should a similar incident occurring here in NSW. If it can’t do that then the company will need to relocate or shut down.

“Residents living less than one kilometre from Orica’s Kooragang Island plant have been voicing their concerns for years over the proximity of the dangerous chemical plant to schools and homes.

“If a leak of hexavalent chromium can reach nearby suburbs such as Stockton imagine what an explosion would do.

“Just like Orica, the company responsible for the Texas explosion has been the subject of several disciplinary actions from the relevant environmental regulators.

“Yet once again it appears that the NSW Environment Protection Authority is taking Orica’s word for it that its operations do not present a safety risk to the people of Stockton.

“Governments need to stop taking the word of the companies whose dangerous activities they are supposed to be enforcing. Apparently the company responsible for the Texas explosion said in its risk management plan that its plant did not pose any threat of fire or explosions.

“We hear similar assurances from Orica, yet of course the risk of an explosion from an ammonium nitrate plant is never zero. And Orica’s plans to increase production from 430,000 tonnes of ammonium nitrate to 750,000 tonnes on Kooragang Island each year only increases the impact of an explosion should one occur.

“The nearest Stockton residents are about 800 metres away from Orica’s Kooragang Island plant. With the Texas blast levelling a five- to six-block radius around the plant with the force of a magnitude-2.1 earthquake, Stockton residents would be very much at risk if an explosion occurred at Orica’s plant nearby.

“The explosion in Texas has shown that unfortunately things do go wrong. The government needs to be honest about the risk posed to Newcastle residents and explore relocation options for the ammonium nitrate production and storage facilities on Kooragang Island.

“The Environment Minister Robyn Parker also needs to order an urgent assessment of all other facilities in NSW that store or produce ammonium nitrate,” said Ms Faehrmann.

In 2012, the EPA undertook an audit of 40 of NSW’s most dangerous licensed facilities after the Orica Kooragang Island incident, however this audit did not assess the risk of explosion or the impact on nearby residents should an explosion occur. The audit included facilities which stored ammonium nitrate, such as:

  • Incitec Pivot Ltd, Kooragang Island
  • Incitec Pivot Fertilisers, Moree
  • Downer-EDI Mining Blasting Services, Singleton
  • Orica, Kooragang Island

Comments (0)

Tags: , , ,

Orica toxic legacy shows need for tougher pollution laws – Greens

Posted on 27 January 2013 by Cate

Greens MP and environment spokesperson Cate Faehrmann says the latest revelations about the toxic pollution legacy from Orica’s facilities at Port Botany in Sydney show just how important tough pollution laws are for protecting community health. See today’s Sun Herald here.

“This frightening saga is an excellent example of why governments need to crack down on polluting industry with tough laws to protect community health,” said Ms Faehrmann.

“Orica has shown complete disregard for community health and local residents. Only strong pollution laws will guarantee communities are not exposed because too many big companies will always put shareholder profits before being a good corporate citizen.

“It took the hard work of residents and, ultimately, media attention to expose this mess. It should not have taken mothers concerned about their kids’ health to get action here.

“If communities have to scream from their rooftops before any action is taken about potentially deadly contamination in their neighbourhoods, then clearly our laws are failing them.

“I congratulate the EPA for finally taking a first step. However, the review at Port Botany must include comprehensive and independent testing in residents homes with the best available expertise. That hasn’t been guaranteed and without it, the ‘review’ will be meaningless.

“The NSW Government must also now order a full audit with independent testing around of all Orica’s facilities both current and former. Given Orica’s track record, there’s every reason to believe their disregard for the safety of the community has been repeated elsewhere,” said Ms Faehrmann.

Media contact: Peter Stahel 0433 005 727

Comments Off

Tags: , , , ,

Parker must take control of Orica’s mercury legacy in Sydney – Greens

Posted on 21 January 2013 by Cate

Following revelations Orica used misleading information to justify its current pollution remediation plan to local residents, Greens MP and environment spokesperson Cate Faehrmann says the Environment Minister Robyn Parker has no choice but to intervene and force Orica to pay for independent testing. See article in today’s Sydney Morning Herald here.

Testing is needed to determine the extent of Mercury contamination from Orica’s former ChlorAlkali facility at Matraville in Sydney’s south.

Residents say the company attempted to blame other nearby industry including a former crematorium, a power station and event home thermometers for the problem. Their claims have been debunked by UNEP accredited remediation expert Andrew Helps, who has demonstrated these sources could only account for a fraction of the problem.”Orica’s ridiculous broken thermometer and tooth filling defence should be a red flag to the Environment Minister Robyn Parker. It’s clear Orica can’t be trusted when it comes to protecting the community’s health,” said Ms Faehrmann.

“Orica is the polluter – not the regulator. It’s not good enough that they are being trusted to take all the right steps. The Minister has to step in and take control and reassure the community their concerns are being taken seriously.

“Anyone who lives near the site has the right to demand answers regarding what their families are being exposed to, especially when the company behaves in a secretive and defensive manner. Complete transparency is the bare minimum residents deserve.

“Orica should be bending over backwards to remediate the pollution they caused, not making excuses and passing the buck.

“We saw what happened last time Orica and the Minister didn’t take the public’s right to know seriously – the Kooragang Island spill was a public relations nightmare because the public were left in the dark for too long.

“In the end, the government has to take responsibility when corporations refuse to take their responsibilities seriously. That’s why Environment Minister Robyn Parker must immediately step in and ensure comprehensive and independent testing takes place of the soil and homes around Orica site,” said Ms Faehrmann.

Media contact: Peter Stahel 0433 005 727

Comments (1)

Tags: , , , ,

Opportunity for wood smoke pollution controls

Posted on 14 November 2012 by Cate

The Environment Protection Authority (EPA) is consulting on a Discussion Paper: Options for Wood Smoke Control in NSW. Wood heaters cause particle (PM2.5) pollution which is considered to be the most dangerous air pollutant, responsible for 10-20 times as many premature deaths as the next worst pollutant, ozone.

The EPA discussion paper is an opportunity to introduce much-needed controls to reduce the health impact of wood heater pollution in urban areas. Here is a briefing on the issue and a submission guide. Briefing Woodsmoke_Discussion_paper_Nov2012

The discussion paper is at http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/woodsmoke/120267WoodSmoke.pdf and the online submission portal is at http://engage.environment.nsw.gov.au/portal/environmentalissues/air/woodsmoke/woodsmoke

Submissions are due 30 November and should be sent to woodsmoke.reduction@epa.nsw.gov.au

Comments (2)

Tags: , , , , , ,

Greens back independent authority to oversee impacts of coal mines

Posted on 30 October 2012 by Cate

Coal train moves through the Hunter wetlands

Responding to the release of a global study into the impacts of coal mining on people’s health, Greens MP and environment spokesperson Cate Faehrmann has backed calls for an independent authority to monitor pollution from coal mines and power stations, and for better mitigation strategies such as buffer zones around new mines.

“When we consider the high number of coal projects in the Hunter, it’s outrageous that proper health impact studies haven’t already been completed.  This kind of information should be available during the planning and approvals process for new mines,” said MsFaehrmann.

“Hunter residents simply don’t have access to the kind of information they deserve regarding the health impacts coal mines are having on their families and communities.

“The jump in particle emissions in the Hunter is in line with the jump in coal production. Dust mitigation efforts are simply not working and something has to be done.

“What’s clear is that a lot of the costs borne by local communities simply aren’t being taken into account in the approvals process. If we put a dollar figure on the health impacts that are happening now and that will be caused for decades to come, these mega coal mines would not be approved.

“The evidence is in, coal mining is wrecking communities and people’s health. It’s time for the government to tell the Hunter community what their exit plan is.

“The NSW Government has to take responsibility for a problem that multinational coal companies won’t solve unless they are forced to.

“We need to replace quarry vision profiteering with investment in renewable energy. Renewable technology is jobs rich and is the pathway to a cleaner and healthier future for Hunter communities,” said Ms Faehrmann.

 

Comments Off

Tags: , , , ,

No new coal mines after 50 percent jump in pollution

Posted on 30 October 2012 by Cate

The author of an Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) report released this week, Nick Agapides, has told the ABC that there has been a 50 percent jump in dust emissions from coal mines in the Hunter region.

Agapides says the jump in particle emissions from 40,000 tonnes a year to 60,000 tonnes a year between 2003 and 2008 is in line with, and a little more than, the jump in coal production from 113 mega tonnes in 2003 to 137 tonnes in 2008.   Coal production in 2010/2011 is around 157 megatonnes and Agapides predicts a 10 – 15 percent increase when the 2011 figures come out.

Greens MP and environment spokesperson Cate Faehrmann said:

“Of course it is no surprise that coal dust emissions increase in line with coal production.  The take home message from these figures is that dust mitigation efforts are not working.

“If this government cared about the health of local communities, they would have to conclude that there should be no more new coal mines,” said Ms Faehrmann.

The EPA has initiated a Dust Stop program and Agapides says nine mines have submitted reports on how they plan to mitigate their dust pollution.

“This is yet more bandaids to try to fix a terminal condition,” said Ms Faehrmann.

“The more reliable and effective way to stop coal dust pollution increasing is to stop approving new mines and instead drive investment in renewable energy technology.

“Far from putting the breaks on the coal industry, the O’Farrell Government has just given the green light to a massive new coal mine at Maules Creek near Narrabri despite concerns over coal dust and irrevocable devastation for endangered woodlands and koala habitat.

The EPA report prepared for the EPA is at http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/air/airinventory.htm

Comments Off

RELATED SITES